Call us FREE today

0800 612 5563 / 020 3507 0314

Facilities Management Company

This company had previously completed their own tenders but noticed their success rate slipping quite drastically. Following a gap analysis they decided to retain our services on an on-going basis in order to win more contracts.

Facilities Management

Type of Project

Bid Management and Bid Writing

Delivery model

Remote working (100%), with one site visit

Lead writer

Matthew Walker

Duration of the bid

Four weeks

Value to the client

£300,000

Service

Facilities Management

Main Challenges

A large number of questions

Strict page limits for most questions, in complex subject areas

A large number of policies and procedures and a considerable amount of supporting evidence for the questions

Minimum font sizes for each question

  • Geographical region – England
  • Output – 30 pages
  • Weighting – 70%/30% quality/price
  • Submission – Electronic upload
  • Outcome – Won

We had a meeting with a company struggling to maintain their previous success in securing new contracts. Having previously written their own tenders, the client’s in-house bid writing team had initially prospered but their success rate had since declined noticeably. This had led to concerns both on their ability to win new contracts and grow as a company, as well as remaining as an incumbent on their existing contracts.

Following a gap analysis it was quickly established that there were a number of errors being made across their bid process, including over-reliance on stock answers, a lack of relevant information, and an inability to respond to each question fully. Initially we completed two PQQs and a tender on their behalf. We were successful with one PQQ and the tender and made the recommendation not to bid on the second PQQ as the company did not meet the financial pre-requisites. This approach ensured that the company did not waste valuable money and time in bidding for a contract at which they were likely to be unsuccessful. This enabled them to focus on developing their policies, procedures and tender writing skills.

This early success reaffirmed their decision to use our Bid Writing services and in the next four months we completed seven PQQs and one further tender, all of which were successful.

After the successes of the first six months, which resulted in a large number of tenders being completed, the suggestion was made that they retain our services on a permanent basis. This enabled them to save money and plan their approach to tendering better, as well as meaning that a formal bid library could be produced, allowing the continual refinement and improvement of their submissions.

Over 30 submissions have now been completed on behalf of this client, helping them secure new key contracts and retain those already secured. Our success rate prior to retention across all their submissions was 80%. Following the ongoing retention of our services this has now increased to 83% – in line with our industry beating success rate for all the PQQs
and ITTs we complete for our clients.

We have scored some of the highest scores we have ever seen for any client (a staggering 99.33% at PQQ stage), and we have also been able to provide procurement advice when the company felt that the Contracting Authority was not conducting the procurement process properly.

In this particular example, we assisted the client with a complicated cleaning and grounds maintenance contract. As the incumbent, the client was keen to win the contract to retain their status, particularly as they had built up close and productive links with the contracting
authority.

The main difficulties associated with this submission were the large number of questions, each of which had strict page limits, covering a large number of sub-topics, as well as font size limits. This meant that all answers were required to be concise and fully answer the question, as well as provide supporting evidence. This supporting evidence included a large number of policies, procedures and documents, such as health and safety method statements. Although these were attached as appendices, we were required to introduce these within each answer, lessening the space available to write each narrative response.

By analysing all material currently in our possession and visiting the client face-to-face, we broke down each question into its constituent parts, identifying the information and supporting evidence required to answer it in full. Once this was done we then wrote each narrative response, sending them to the client as they were completed so that they could be quality assured by them, returned and amended before being proofread and quality assured before submission. This ‘rolling’ review process enabled all responses to be checked quickly and efficiently, avoiding wasting time and having to rush the review close to the submission deadline.

This approach bore fruit – the bid was successful, with the feedback commenting positively on the answers provided within the submission. By retaining the contract the client was able to grow further and develop.

Call us now to speak to a member of our Bid Team:

0203 507 0314 or direct to mobile: 07590 276 006