Tendering for government contracts can be a competitive process, and one which focuses on value-adding techniques and not just an initial low price.
The construction industry is renowned for competitive tendering and has possibly been given a bad name in low-price tendering methods. However, framework agreements (which are common in construction and amongst other industries) are a perfect example of a competitive process benefiting the winning bidders as they have access to ongoing work, sometimes by multiple government bodies, without having to tender each time.
Understanding the principles behind competitive tendering for government contracts can help guide your bid submission and doesn’t need to be a challenging task.
Value for money
The main benefit perceived in competitive tendering for government contracts is value for money. It is thought that a more competitive process will drive down prices and drive up added value, as firms all strive to showcase themselves as the most attractive choice for the contract. Typically, this is done via a competitive price and then further benefits which the contracting authority will gain – it should not be based on a low price alone. Examples of added value might be:
- Additional small-scale works delivered for free
- Savings that are then directly transferred to the end client
- Innovations or advanced technology which streamlines processes.
All of these should be directly outlined in your submission, with monetary values included, if possible, to provide a tangible benefit to the assessor.
These benefits are not to be confused with social value, which is another topic entirely!
Competitive tendering can also provide transparency in the marketplace – one of the government’s main aims in public sector procurement. To abide by the laws, a government contract must be advertised to all, available to SMEs (most of the time) and information must be transparent and free throughout the process. The evaluation of the contract is done as set out in the tender documents, and once awarded, the contract award is published to all.
Disadvantages of competitive tendering
There are, of course, disadvantages associated with competitive tendering. The premise of goods or services being procured in a competitive manner can harm the buyer-supplier relationship, as the supplier begrudges offering their bid at a lower price with additional benefits to the buyer, and the buyer is faced with a difficult and timely evaluation process.
It may also discourage bidders and actually limit the number of offerings if potential bidders deem the process too competitive and worry they cannot deliver.
Using your competitive edge
It is important throughout the bid process to determine your unique selling points, as this will help drive your competitive edge throughout the quality element of your bid submission. Unique selling points may seem a natural thing for your company to do, but in reality, they might provide added value, additional benefits and a differentiator from your competitors.