Site icon Executive Compass

The Anatomy of a Winning Bid: What Procurement Teams Look For

To produce a winning bid, tenderers must tailor their proposals to the expectations of procurement teams and evaluators.

As a competition, the aim of every bid writer is to produce a winning bid. This means not only writing credibly and with confidence, but actively persuading the evaluation team that your organisation’s proposed solution is the best approach to deliver the contract scope.

How do procurement teams evaluate tenders?

Public sector tenders normally take a holistic approach when evaluating a tender submission, with a more even split between quality and price and social value also usually forming part of the scoring criteria.

This is reflected in the recent shift in language from ‘most economically advantageous tender’ (MEAT) to ‘most advantageous tender’ (MAT) under the Procurement Act 2023, which governs public procurement regulations.

What forms a winning bid?

A winning bid or tender submission is a clearly written, compliant and tailored proposal which positions you as the ideal supplier for the contract. To win a submission, you will need to demonstrate understanding of the buyer’s needs, showcase relevant experience on similar contracts and present this in a clean, professional document.

Core components of a winning bid Strategic considerations for a winning bid
  • Demonstrating thorough understanding of the requirements of the tender, including the authority’s wider objectives, such as environmental initiatives
  • Tailoring your content to the specific contract by mirroring the client’s language in tender documents
  • Displaying compliance by referring to relevant legislation as well as the authority’s policies and procedures
  • Implement robust bid planning processes to ensure sufficient time for drafting, bid review, amendments and upload of the final submission.
  • Focusing on the evaluation criteria within responses to maximise available marks
  • Highlighting your unique selling points or value propositions within content of responses, distinguishing your submission from other bidders
  • Support your claims with evidence, such as statistics, case studies, KPI adherence or impactful images showing successful outcomes of previous projects
  • Review tender feedback from previous submissions to address potential weaknesses around certain topics.

 

As above, a competitive, high-scoring submission takes significant time and will require thought around including key differentiators from other bidders.

What are key differentiators for a winning tender?

Ultimately, a winning submission will actively persuade the evaluator that you offer the most advantageous solution at the lowest risk to the authority.

Although we cannot account for individual preferences of each evaluator, certain themes, topics and presentation of your proposals can be described as ‘key differentiators’ – distinguishing your submission from other bidders.

As a general rule, these include:

What strategies will produce a winning tender submission?

All of this supports a structured, tried-and-tested strategy which you can implement across all submissions, irrespective of the industry, sector or buyer organisation. As part of all submissions, we advise:

Support with producing winning tenders

At Executive Compass, our expert bid and tender writers have been involved in over 7,000 submissions over the past 16 years, with a fully auditable 85% success rate.

Our bid services to support winning submissions include:

For a free 30-minute consultation on how we can best support you, our sales and marketing team can be contacted on info@executivecompass.co.uk or via telephone 0800 612 5563.

Exit mobile version